Even Porn Is Subject To Darwinism
Sep. 23rd, 2008 06:38 pmIs it just me or have the men featured on BearFilms this past year, with a few exceptions, just been amazingly meh? No VeniceCubs like the days of yore, just a steady stream of guys who fail to trip my trigger, each new model only notable for how much he looks exactly like LAST weeks model.
I would think the smart porn money is on knowing what your audience wants... cubs, chubs, redheads or a unique look. After the first four years or so it seemed like BearFilms catered more to the taste of the photographer than the audience's. For a few years, the majority of the fellows were buzzcut beefy boys and now... eh. The steady stream of mediocrity is hard to criticize if only because it fails to excite even enough attention to care.
Is BearFilms just missing the mark lately or what?
I would think the smart porn money is on knowing what your audience wants... cubs, chubs, redheads or a unique look. After the first four years or so it seemed like BearFilms catered more to the taste of the photographer than the audience's. For a few years, the majority of the fellows were buzzcut beefy boys and now... eh. The steady stream of mediocrity is hard to criticize if only because it fails to excite even enough attention to care.
Is BearFilms just missing the mark lately or what?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 12:06 am (UTC)I haven't really peeked at BF.com in a while but they have always sorta had the "more is more" business model of basically inviting anyone who is willing to make some porn with them. The results are videos where you might have one scene where everyone involved is hot (to you).
I mean, even my most favorite vid of their doing (Midnight Growlers) has guys I'm not all that into doing some enjoyable stuff to each other.
And if it doesn't come through for you, well, there's always xTube...
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 12:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 12:17 am (UTC)I would like to see some numbers on if they are still selling at a high pace but if they are, then it is just a product of speialzkg those audiences. Large mainstream companies can keep several lines of film going with different branding but one brand can not be all things for all people. I don't find the current models hot but I think a large enough number do to keep the profitable. Then again maybe they are like biggercity and own multiple brands spacing the out in the market to appeal to different demographics. I might like the heavyset brand and it's BIG boys but others might like the hefty works bran with younger smaller boys.
In the end, I'd like to see some numbers but it reasonable to think bearfilms has narrowed thief focus towards lovers of leaner, somewhat older guys with an emphasis sometimeson rougher trade. I can see how that decision could be profitable.
There are other avenues now: cyberbears especially has targeted a more big-man friendly audience. Atticmen seems to be aiming for the treasure island media spot with risky behavior and cheaper values but big men are there often.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 12:20 am (UTC)It's harder to stand out in a market that is pretty flooded with homemade bear porn too. They have their work cut out for them.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 03:42 am (UTC)What always set BearFilms apart for me was that it was real, visceral men going at one another with reckless abandon and (occasionally) decent sound, lighting & clear camera work. I can only look at so much homemade Bear Porn before I get tired of the crap lighting, single angle and unwillingness to engage in hardcore sex acts I like.
Aside from CyberBears, which specializes in larger guys, BearFilms is the only pro bear studio putting out decently filmed (albeit less-inspiring) bear porn consistently.
Though I am a fan of Pig Daddy Productions, Atticmen & XXXL Productions.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 03:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 05:22 am (UTC)Wait... no i'm hot. Yeah 500 is a pittance
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 01:37 am (UTC)*swoon*
Date: 2008-09-24 03:46 am (UTC)Venicecub.
Venicecub.
That man is frakking beautiful. Fairly nice guy too. I think I should close the Home for Wayward Cubs and renovate to it being the Home for Wayward Bearporn Actors.
Re: *swoon*
Date: 2008-09-24 03:56 am (UTC)Re: *swoon*
Date: 2008-09-24 02:36 pm (UTC)Though I can't get on bnskin due to being kicked off since I wouldn't play along with their stupid ass rules for membership (ooh big loss..I'm a little too proud of that).
Re: *swoon*
Date: 2008-09-24 03:14 pm (UTC)Re: *swoon*
Date: 2008-09-24 03:17 pm (UTC)That's just my perception of it. I'm sure others could explain it better. lol
Re: *swoon*
Date: 2008-09-24 03:35 pm (UTC)Re: *swoon*
Date: 2008-09-24 03:36 pm (UTC)Re: *swoon*
Date: 2008-09-24 05:23 am (UTC)Re: *swoon*
Date: 2008-09-24 02:30 pm (UTC)Re: *swoon*
Date: 2008-09-24 02:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 03:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 03:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 05:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 01:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 08:19 am (UTC)I do like the look of many of the men of late, but yes, I AM tired of all the clones. Don't get me wrong, I think most of them are hot as hell and if I thought I had a chance in hell of a roll in the hay (or just a good strong fuck) with some of them, I most certainly would. However, what I AM bored of is that same look. They look alike much like so many porn actors of the 70's had the Burt Reynolds look. I am tired of what is quickly becoming less of a bear clone and more of a bear cliche. This is of course regarding my tastes in PORN. Otherwise, I'll happily gawk at all the hairy bearded men all day.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 10:28 am (UTC)Their stuff also had bareback, which for some is still a very taboo subject. A friend of ours is an actor for them and told us that the backers threatened to pull out (!!!) if they didn't stop doing bareback.
There are two actors that hang out at the campground where we were this past weekend. It's honestly a little annoying as when folks discover that they are there it's like Sam and Linds showed up at the club. People get all goofy and tongue-tied. They are hot, but in person, meh.
And, for my money, Massive Studio is the place to go. Great films, great actors, quality stuff.
However, I will still hold on to my Bear Films DVDs with Steve Ellis. DAMN! That is one hot red head.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 01:57 pm (UTC)Since I did the film with two of my partners, we didn't use condoms. I only topped my ex-John and no other fucking took place as I recall. That twenty minute scence was filmed over a grueling 8 hours filled with too many crew, hot lights and a random guy jerking off in the corner.
To my memory it was like making porn in a sweat shop.
That being said, the early Bearfilms stuff is HOT. Amazingly hot, immediate, visceral and raw. It's what drew me to the movies in the first place. Now it all just seems written in, spiritless and formulaic.
Massive Studio you say? Hmn.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 03:19 pm (UTC)I'm sorry - but did you just call a guy in bear films an "actor"?
I hardly think that bears getting paid to have sex in an amateur-like setting could constitute them as "actors".
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 03:30 pm (UTC): )
I didn't know what else to call them really, and cum dumpster just didn't seem right.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 03:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 03:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 03:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 12:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 03:56 pm (UTC)Porn Extra? Yes.
Plus honestly? I think I look WAY better now than I did back then. Much less awkward.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 04:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 04:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 03:16 pm (UTC)In the end it's just always looked like cheap amateur porn with more often than not - less than attractive guys.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 03:56 pm (UTC)So now I'm curious... what porn companies/performers do you consider being able to pass muster?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 04:28 pm (UTC)And ...um...some of the guys in some of the films, I've had the chance to play around with. In person....wowwwwwwwwwwwww.....incredible. On film....kinda dull...but that might just be because I wasn't in on that action.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 04:39 pm (UTC)Kind of distracts from the mood a bit. :-)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 04:51 pm (UTC)And I know with out a doubt I would suck (no pun intended) if I had to perform with all those technical people around....that's mostly why I turned down both cyber and bear films when they inquired. Which is sad...cuz I approached one of them first...then wimped out.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 10:07 pm (UTC)VeniceCub - fuck me all day and night!
Clint Taylor - all-time favorite.
Andrew Mason - one of the better fucks i've ever had!
Other than that...a few random hotties here and there. I used to have a huge crush on Fantasy Bear Jeff, until I heard he's very stuck up and kinda ass-hole-ish in real life.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 11:06 pm (UTC)and you got to romp Andrew Mason? Lucky!
no subject
Date: 2008-09-25 12:44 pm (UTC)and yes, when I lived in Tampa I got to play with Andrew....fucked in every room of his house...he even threw me up on his dinner room table and pounded my ass ;)